When I was driving cabs in Newcastle in the 80s and 90s a lot of the fleet was (how shall I put it) rather old. Car 7 was a 1972 HQ Kingswood; 23 and 33 were XC Falcons (of a similar age to Car 7). Some of these vehicles had, in fact, travelled well over three quarters of a million kilometres and were quite tired indeed.
It is a tribute to their manufacturers at how cars can get such a flogging, and yet still remain roadworthy and operational. One of the contributing factors is that a taxi engine very rarely gets cold, and so all the wear and tear from cold starts you get in a normal car doesn't happen in a vehicle operated for such long periods.
However, as one of my passengers informed me, "I'm not too keen on paying 70c a kilometre to get carted around in a twenty year old clapped out Kingswood". At the time I think he was getting carted around in a fifteen year old Kingswood, and I could easily see his point.
I was glad when in the early 1990s, the RTA brought in a new rule that any vehicle to be operated as a taxi had to be less than six years old. This meant far greater safety for passengers, probably lower maintenance costs for the owners, but a much greater capitalisation on their part. Nearly every taxi in Newcastle needed to be replaced.
There was a transition period in place for existing vehicles: I think everyone got two years to comply. The base owned a number of Special Purpose Vehicles, which were modified to carry wheelchairs. There was a four-year phase-in period for these cars, as they represented a substantial inverstment on the part of the base, and the RTA didn't want to inconvenience the wheelchair bound users of these vehicles.
But it was a BIG change to the system, and certainly one I welcomed. It is a lot nicer not only being a passenger in a newish vehicle, but also DRIVING the things.
FINALE
-
FINALE
Brenda Bryant is indisposed.
RINKLY RIMES, therefore, is closed.
Thanks for all the many times
You kept me going with my rhymes.
She may ret...
11 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment